You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of microalgal cultivation methods for protein production

From: Advancements and challenges in microalgal protein production: A sustainable alternative to conventional protein sources

Cultivation method

Energy source

Carbon source

Applications

Advantages

Challenges

Suitability for large-scale production

References

Phototrophic

Light

COâ‚‚

• Biofuels

• Food

• Bioremediation

• Sustainable

• Scalable,

• Low-cost

• Mitigates CO₂ emissions

• Light dependency

• Low cell density

• Contamination risks

• High evaporation rates

High

[19, 20]

Heterotrophic

Organic compounds

Organic compounds

• Biofuels

• Bioplastics

• Nutraceuticals

• High biomass productivity

• Controlled growth

• Flexible substrate use

• Expensive substrates

• Contamination risks

Moderate

[21, 22]

Mixotrophic

Light & organics

COâ‚‚ & organic compounds

• Biofuels

• High-value products

• Versatility

• Enhanced biomass and metabolite production

• CO₂ recycling

• Cost of organics

• Metabolic complexity

Low

[23, 24]

Photoheterotrophic

Light

Organic compounds

• Specialty metabolites

• Biopharmaceuticals

• Enhanced light- metabolite production

• High costs

• Limited scalability

Low

[22, 25]